City of Villains has got me thinkin' lately. Listen up.
I love CoV to death (as you may have noticed, seeing as I have a website about it), and it's got a richness in setting and storyline at least the equal of City of Heroes. It's designed to be viable as a standalone game, not just an expansion, and it succeeds, rocking hard to boot.
But — in my mind, at least — everything that goes down on the Rogue Isles is always subordinate to the happenings in Paragon City. Because the heroes are, you know, the heroes of our universe. And whatever the villains do, it's secondary, almost by definition. CoH and CoV are equivalent products from any technical standpoint, yet to me CoH has always seemed like the main game, with CoV its evil hunchback albino little brother.
Why do I have this bias? Partly, I guess, it's because CoH came out first. But mostly it's because that's how the source material — comic books themselves — frame the good vs. evil conflict. With few exceptions (see below), comics are about the good guys. The heroes are the protagonists. They get the dialogue and the drama. They come first. The books are usually named after them. As for the villains … well, they're around to give the heroes something to do. You rarely see them doing anything else. Spider-Man can have all sorts of personal issues, like sick old Aunt May, which are portrayed in detail because, hey, it's his book. Electro might have a sick old aunt, too, but if he does, it doesn't affect anything and we're not told about it. In comics, as in a lot of popular culture, the villains exist for the heroes. Ya with me?
City of Villains provides something that doesn't have much precedent anywhere else. We're telling the story of a group of superbeings, but they're evil stories. When the protagonists succeed in their goals, the world is worse off. Their victories are a total downer for pretty much everyone but themselves.
What if there were an Infamy Unlimited monthly comic? Would you read it? Or would it just depress you?
I've tried to search around for examples of villains who have been the stars of their own monthly books, and not surprisingly, the field is sparse. Kobra, which DC ran for a while in the late '70s, is all I could find. (I'm leaving out Suicide Squad and other "antihero" titles, which are not really what I'm talking about here.)
I never read Kobra, but I can't help but imagine each story must have this sort of effect on the reader: either Kobra is thwarted in his Evil Plot of the Month, and you feel like you totally wasted your thirty 1976 cents; or else he succeeds in his Evil Plot of the Month, and kills a bunch of puppies or whatever, and you're left all bummed out and maybe in need of a shower. It doesn't surprise me that this has not been an experiment that's been tried often.
On the other hand, maybe the trick is simply using the right villain. Because would I read a monthly Joker comic? Hell yeah. Joker rules.
The floor is yours, true believers. Evil comics: an artistically and commercially viable form of expression? Discuss.